IELTS Writing Task 2 sample answer (band score 8-9)
IELTS Essay # 1269 - New homes are needed but the only space available is in the countryside
- Details
- Last Updated: Sunday, 16 March 2025 00:00
- Written by IELTS Mentor
- Hits: 26405
IELTS Writing Task 2/ IELTS Essay:
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Write about the following topic:
In many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for building them is in the countryside. Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there.
What is your opinion about this?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
Model Answer 1: [Opinon: it is important to preserve the countryside]
In many regions, the need for new homes is evident, but the available space for construction is predominantly located in the countryside. While some individuals may argue that building new homes in rural areas is essential for meeting the growing housing demands, I firmly believe that it is of utmost importance to preserve the countryside and refrain from encroaching upon its natural beauty and ecological integrity.
First and foremost, the countryside serves as a vital haven for biodiversity and ecosystems. It harbours diverse plant and animal species, many of which may be endangered or on the brink of extinction. Constructing new homes in these areas would lead to habitat destruction, fragmentation, and disturbance, jeopardizing the delicate balance of these ecosystems. Preserving the countryside not only ensures the survival of countless species but also supports ecosystem services such as water purification, pollination, and carbon sequestration. For example, the fragmentation caused by urban development would disrupt migration patterns and limit the gene flow between populations, further endangering the delicate biodiversity of the area.
Moreover, the countryside holds immense cultural and historical significance. It is often intertwined with the local heritage, traditions, and folklore of a region. The landscapes, historic sites, and traditional architecture found in rural areas contribute to the cultural identity of communities. By protecting the countryside, we preserve a tangible connection to our past and provide future generations with an opportunity to appreciate and learn from their cultural heritage. For instance, the rolling hills and ancient stone walls of the countryside in England are not only visually stunning but also symbolise the country's rich agricultural history and rural traditions. Preserving these landscapes allows visitors and locals alike to experience the charm and character of the region while gaining a deeper understanding of its cultural heritage.
In conclusion, while the need for new homes is undeniable, I firmly believe that preserving the countryside should take precedence over construction in these areas. The countryside plays a crucial role in maintaining biodiversity, preserving cultural heritage, and offering recreational opportunities. It is our responsibility to protect these precious landscapes and ensure that future generations can enjoy and benefit from their inherent value.
Model Answer 2: [Opinion: constructing new homes in the countryside is justified]
In many regions, there is an urgent need for new housing, and often the only available land is in rural areas. While some individuals assert that preserving the countryside is essential, I believe that constructing new homes in these areas is justified as it effectively addresses housing shortages and provides more affordable living options for residents.
One primary reason for supporting rural housing development is the severe shortage of homes in urban centres, where overcrowding has reached critical levels. Major cities around the world suffer from escalating property prices, limited living spaces, and worsening conditions due to overpopulation. Extending residential developments into nearby rural areas would ease this pressure significantly. For instance, housing projects outside London in counties such as Kent and Surrey have successfully accommodated thousands of families, reducing urban overcrowding and enhancing living standards.
Furthermore, countryside development allows for the creation of affordable housing, which is increasingly inaccessible in urban areas due to soaring real estate prices. Many young people and families find it impossible to purchase or even rent adequate accommodation within city limits. Rural housing can offer cost-effective options, enabling more people to become homeowners or afford comfortable living spaces. For example, rural developments in Australia and Canada have enabled families to acquire spacious homes at significantly lower prices compared to their metropolitan counterparts, fostering a higher quality of life.
In conclusion, although protecting rural landscapes has its merits, addressing the acute housing crisis and providing affordable residential options should be prioritised. Building homes in the countryside is a practical and necessary solution, benefiting both individuals and communities by offering accessible housing and reducing the strain on crowded urban centres.
Sample Answer 3: [it is essential to leave the countryside intact.]
The issue of building new homes in the countryside, which is often the only space left for building more houses, is contentious. There is indeed a pressing need for new housing in many areas, but the preservation of rural landscapes is also important. In my opinion, it is essential to leave the countryside intact.
To begin with, the countryside is not just a picturesque backdrop; it serves vital ecological and agricultural functions. The destruction of natural habitats and farmland can have far-reaching consequences for local ecosystems and food production. For instance, agricultural expansion is a major driver of deforestation and other ecological destruction, decimating habitats and biodiversity. One example is the displacement of lowland forests in Indonesia due to oil palm cultivation, and the damage caused to the Cerrado and Atlantic Forests of Brazil and Paraguay through soy production. These unsustainable farming practices and the loss of forests result in severe erosion.
Moreover, the rural landscape is an integral part of our cultural heritage and identity. It is therefore crucial that any development in these areas is undertaken with great care and sensitivity. In Italy, rural landscapes hold great significance as a part of the country's cultural heritage. As a result, the authorities have implemented measures to safeguard and promote these landscapes as valuable resources. The approach involves preserving physical locations, sharing knowledge, sustainable management, effective communication, and the transmission of associated heritage values. Unfortunately, constructing additional buildings to support the growing population would make these initiatives unfeasible.
In conclusion, while there is a clear need for new homes in many areas to support the growing population, it is essential that we do not sacrifice the countryside in the process.
Idea Generation for this IELTS Essay:
Essay question:
In many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for building them is in the countryside. Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there.
What is your opinion about this?
Essay type:
Opinion Essay.
Main question of this essay:
Do you think building homes in the countryside is justified or should the countryside be protected?
Reasons why countryside should be protected and not used for new homes:
1. Preservation of natural habitats and biodiversity:
The countryside often contains vital habitats for wildlife and rare plant species, contributing to ecological balance. Building homes can destroy these natural environments, endangering biodiversity. For instance, construction projects in rural areas can lead to loss of habitat for birds, insects, and mammals, threatening species that depend on these ecosystems.
2. Maintaining agricultural land:
The countryside is essential for agriculture, providing food and resources critical to a nation's self-sustainability. Constructing homes on agricultural land reduces available farmland and affects food production. For example, urban expansion into rural areas in countries like India and China has significantly reduced fertile farmland, threatening food security.
3. Prevention of environmental degradation:
Extensive urbanisation and housing developments in rural areas contribute to pollution, deforestation, and soil erosion, severely damaging the environment. Protecting these areas helps maintain cleaner air and water quality. As an example, unregulated housing developments in rural parts of Brazil have led to deforestation, contributing to climate change and loss of biodiversity.
4. Maintaining cultural heritage and rural traditions:
The countryside often preserves traditional ways of life, unique cultural heritage, and community identity. Urbanisation threatens these traditions and cultural values. For instance, in Europe, rural villages that become urbanised frequently lose their traditional architecture, community spirit, and historical significance.
5. Ensuring recreational spaces and tourism potential:
Countryside areas offer valuable spaces for leisure, recreation, and tourism. Building homes in these areas reduces their attractiveness and accessibility, impacting tourism and community well-being. To illustrate, the Lake District in the UK attracts millions of tourists annually, and excessive housing development would detract from its natural beauty and economic value.
Reasons why building new homes in the countryside may be justified:
1. Addressing housing shortages:
Many cities face critical housing shortages, leading to high property prices and homelessness. Utilizing rural areas for housing can alleviate urban housing pressure. For example, expanding housing developments into nearby countryside areas has successfully reduced housing shortages in cities like London and Paris.
2. Economic growth and employment opportunities:
Constructing new homes stimulates local economies, creating jobs in construction and related industries. This can boost rural economies, providing long-term economic benefits. For example, building homes in rural areas of Australia has generated significant employment and strengthened local businesses.
3. Improved infrastructure and services in rural areas:
Housing developments can lead to enhanced infrastructure, such as improved roads, schools, and healthcare services. This raises living standards for rural communities. To illustrate, new housing developments in rural parts of Canada have brought essential facilities and public services to previously isolated communities.
4. Reduced urban congestion:
Expanding housing into rural areas can ease overcrowding in urban centres, reducing traffic congestion, pollution, and pressure on city services. For instance, decentralizing housing from Tokyo’s crowded city centre into nearby rural regions has effectively reduced urban density and improved quality of life.
5. Affordable living options:
Building homes in the countryside generally provides more affordable housing options compared to urban areas. This helps families and individuals find quality accommodation at lower costs. For example, many young families in the UK move to rural areas where housing costs are significantly lower compared to urban cities like London or Manchester.
Report