IELTS Writing Task 2/ Essay Topics with sample answer.
IELTS Essay # 86 - Education should be free to all and paid by the government
- Details
- Last Updated: Friday, 21 April 2023 16:28
- Written by IELTS Mentor
- Hits: 271599
IELTS Writing Task 2/ IELTS Essay:
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Write about the following topic:
All education (primary, secondary and further education) should be free to all people and paid and managed by the government.
Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
Model Answer 1: [Agreement]
It is often argued that education, including elementary, secondary, and higher education, should be available to all individuals free of cost and managed by the government. I strongly support this viewpoint and believe that free education is a fundamental right of every individual.
Education is a crucial aspect of an individual's personal growth and development, and providing free education to all will ensure that everyone has access to it, regardless of their socio-economic background. By providing free education, we can help reduce the gap between the rich and the poor and provide equal opportunities to all. Moreover, government funding of education can ensure that the quality of education is maintained, and all students have access to the best resources and facilities. This can also help reduce the burden on families and allow them to invest in other essential needs.
Furthermore, education is essential for a country's economic growth and development. With an educated workforce, a country can become more competitive in the global market, attract foreign investment, and create new job opportunities. Therefore, it is in the government's best interest to ensure that education is accessible to all individuals.
Finally, free education, paid for and managed by the government, can help to reduce inequality in society. When education is only available to those who can afford it, it leads to a gap between the rich and poor, resulting in unequal opportunities and limited social mobility. However, when the government provides education for free, it ensures that every citizen has equal access to education, regardless of their financial background.
In conclusion, education is a right and not a privilege, and it should be accessible to all individuals regardless of their financial status. By providing free education, the government can ensure that every individual has equal opportunities to learn and grow, and thus, contribute to the country's economic and social development.
Model Answer 2: [Disagreement]
In recent years, there has been much debate around the question of whether all education should be state-funded and managed by the government. While some argue that this would be an effective way to promote equal access to education, I disagree with this statement for several reasons.
Firstly, providing free education for all would be an enormous financial burden on the government, which would likely result in higher taxes for citizens. Moreover, such a policy could lead to a decline in the quality of education, as institutions may struggle to maintain their standards with limited resources. Additionally, the idea that all education should be free may not incentivize students to work hard or take their studies seriously. If education were free, some students might not feel motivated to study, as they would not have the same financial investment in their education as they would if they were paying for it themselves.
Furthermore, there is value in having private institutions that are independently managed and funded. These institutions often offer specialized programs and resources that may not be available at public institutions and can offer students a unique educational experience. Private institutions can also be a source of innovation, as they are often able to respond more quickly to changes in the job market or emerging technologies. This is why the government should not take steps that would abolish private educational institutions.
In conclusion, while it is important to promote equal access to education, I do not believe that all education should be free to all people and paid for and managed by the government. This would be financially unsustainable and could result in a decline in the quality of education.
Model Answer 3:
Education is an important part of everyone's life and it plays a very important role in the growth of an individual. Making education free for everyone and managing all by the government will be a very big step towards the rapid growth of a society. All parents want to make their children educated by sending them to school, colleges but sometimes due to the lack of resources, they have to deprive their children even from the basic education. By making education free of all will ensure that nobody will miss education just because they can’t afford to pay.
A government's step of making the education free will set an example in our society. It will show that if you have a strong will and determination to study and prosper, not having any money or resource will not stop you from making a paradigm shift.
Education with no fees will identify all those talents which can be at top given education and guidance but get lost because their parents can’t afford to pay for schools. Everyone will stand equal chance to succeed. It will increase the literacy rate of that country and will improve the growth of that country as well. It was seen in the past that countries having higher literacy rates have been more successful. By making education free, a majority of people will be educated, making overall a positive environment in our society. There will be fewer crimes in society. Educating people will be making them more responsible.
Governments should put more emphasis on education by making it free. Just like food and shelter education should also be a basic right and free for everyone.
[ by - Ridhima ]
Model Answer 4:
The opinion that every citizen should have the right to study at school or university for free is very controversial one. Those, who disagree, refer to enormous expenditures of government in case of establishing such laws. Although, I hold the viewpoint that not charging people for education could become very beneficial for a country and its economy.
First, young people from poor families could be very smart. Looking back to history and biographies of distinguished people, raised in poverty can illustrate this best. Making schooling available only for fortunate is not fair. Moreover, the state well-being could also be affected, because there would be a lack of talented specialists, whose skills was not discovered and developed by proper training.
Another advantage of making education free of charge is the happiness of the nation. An individual's inability to collect the amount of money he needs to pay school or university fee cause stress and anxiety in the middle-class society, which can even keep them from having children. Nowadays we can see that the lowest birthrate is in countries where prices of enrollment to highest education institutions are very high. This clearly indicates the fact that citizens of rich countries do not feel able to provide their future offspring proper education.
Finally, nothing seems to be more beneficial to a country's economy than an educated and intelligent nation. Free courses and study programs can prepare excellent specialists, who would work to bring profit themselves and hence their country. That would surely compensate most expenses of state budget caused by education of no charge.
To sum up, even though making all schools free can be very expensive for a state's economy, advantages are invaluable. After several years such improvements would bring fruits of happy, intelligent nation confident about its future.
Report