IELTS Writing Task 2/ Essay Topics with sample answer.
IELTS Essay # 1169 - Families who send children to private schools should not pay taxes
- Details
- Last Updated: Thursday, 25 January 2024 16:47
- Written by IELTS Mentor
- Hits: 120294
IELTS Writing Task 2/ IELTS Essay:
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Write about the following topic:
Families who send their children to private schools should not be required to pay taxes that support the state education system.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
Model Answer 1: [Disagreement]
The question of whether families enrolling their children in private schools should be exempted from taxes supporting the state education system is a subject of ongoing debate. While some argue that it is unfair for them to contribute to a system they do not use, I firmly believe that public education benefits society as a whole, and families with children in private schools should not be exempted from state education taxes.
To commence, public education provides substantial societal benefits, demanding contributions from all, irrespective of their utilization of the system. Public education is perceived as a societal equalizer, offering a level playing field for students, regardless of their socioeconomic backgrounds. Thus, affluent families choosing private education should bear the responsibility of supporting state-run education, ensuring accessibility and affordability for those less privileged. The notion that every eligible taxpayer should contribute to the maintenance of public education stems from the belief that education is a cornerstone of societal development, and its benefits extend beyond individual use.
Furthermore, private schools inherently rely on public services provided by the state. They leverage national curriculum standards, and support from the education ministry, and use essential utilities, infrastructure, and amenities funded by taxpayers. Consequently, parents opting for private institutions should not be exempted from their duty to contribute to state education taxes, as they indirectly benefit from the publicly funded resources and services that facilitate the functioning of private schools.
In conclusion, while some advocate for tax exemptions for families with children in private schools, I contend that public education is a collective societal benefit, necessitating contributions from all members. The sustainability and inclusivity of public education depend on a shared commitment to its funding, ensuring equitable access for students from diverse socio-economic backgrounds.
Model Answer 2: [Agreement]
Whether families sending their children to private schools should be exempt from taxes supporting the state education system is a topic that invites careful consideration. While some argue for this exemption, asserting that private school families essentially opt out of public education, others contend that contributing to the broader education system is a civic responsibility. In my view, families choosing private education should indeed be exempt from taxes supporting state schools.
One compelling reason to support this exemption is the voluntary nature of private school enrollment. Families opting for private education actively choose an alternative to the state system, often due to specific educational needs, philosophies or considerations. In this context, it seems inequitable to compel these families to financially support a public education system they have consciously decided not to participate in. Thus a family that chooses a private school with a specialized curriculum tailored to their child's needs should not be forced to pay taxes supporting the state system. If they are forced, it appears counterproductive and lacks fairness.
Moreover, private schools often alleviate the burden on state resources by independently financing their facilities, staff, and curriculum. This lessens the strain on the state education system, allowing public schools to direct their resources more efficiently to students who remain within their purview. For instance, public schools often have limited capacity to enrol students. So when rich parents opt for private schools for their children, they are in a way helping public schools so that they can reserve seats for children from needy families.
In conclusion, advocating for tax exemptions for families sending their children to private schools is rooted in the principles of choice and fairness. It acknowledges the voluntary nature of private education and recognizes the financial independence of private institutions. This approach fosters a more equitable educational landscape, allowing families to invest in education that aligns with their values and preferences.
Sample Answer 3: [Disagreement]
The education system, in most countries, is primarily supported by the government while private schools are expensive as private organisations maintain them. Some people opine that people who send their offspring to private schools should be exempted from paying taxes for state education. I, however, disagree with this proposal.
First of all, public schools are open to everyone. When people decide to send their children to private schools, they accept the higher fee willingly. From a practical point of view, affluent citizens send their children to private schools, and they are higher taxpayers. If they do not support state education, managing the state-supported education system would become difficult. Thus, a double standard in tax would create an outcry among the populace. Secondly, all citizens should spontaneously pay the education tax to fulfil their duty to the country. The money collected through tax is used to run the education system of the country, and that is why taxpayers have a natural obligation to contribute to the state-run education system.
Finally, not all citizens utilise the services provided to the public by the taxpayers' money. For instance, many city-dwellers always turn to private healthcare services despite they pay taxes for state-owned medical facilities. This is why a dual tax policy for individuals who send their offspring to a private school would disintegrate the whole tax collecting system.
In conclusion, I strongly support that every eligible citizen, no matter whether they send their children to public or private schools, should pay the state education tax. This is the best way to keep education free for poor parents and affordable for middle-class people.
Report