Details

Written by IELTS Mentor

IELTS Writing Task 2/ IELTS Essay:

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Write about the following topic:

Write at least 250 words.

Model Answer 1: [View: tourism should be restricted in specific locations]

Preserving local culture amidst the influx of tourism poses a significant dilemma, inviting contrasting perspectives on whether banning tourism in certain areas is a viable solution or if it should be open as changes will ultimately take place. This essay will explore both views. In my opinion, restricting tourism in specific locations is crucial to safeguarding and nurturing the essence of local cultures.

On the one hand, proponents argue that change is an inevitable facet of progress and development. They assert that banning tourism in particular areas would not halt the evolution of cultures but merely delay the inevitable. For instance, technological advancements and globalization have significantly altered cultural landscapes worldwide, rendering complete preservation challenging. Such changes took place even in places like Japan which was close to foreigners for many decades.

Conversely, advocates for banning tourism in select regions emphasize the potential detrimental impact on local cultures due to the commodification and homogenization of traditions. The overwhelming influx of tourists can lead to the exploitation and commercialization of cultural practices, transforming them into mere spectacles for entertainment. The delicate balance between tradition and tourism can be observed in Bali, where excessive tourism has significantly impacted the island's cultural integrity, eroding its authenticity.

I align with the viewpoint that restricting tourism in specific areas is essential to protect and sustain local cultures. Controlled access can ensure that cultural practices and traditions remain authentic and are not overshadowed by the commercial interests of tourism.

In conclusion, while change is inevitable, safeguarding local cultures from the adverse impacts of mass tourism remains a paramount concern. Selective limitations on tourism in certain areas can serve as a protective shield, preserving the authenticity and richness of indigenous cultures for future generations.

Model Answer 2: [ View: change is inevitable, and banning tourism will have no benefits.]

Preserving local culture in the face of increasing tourism is a topic of considerable debate. Some argue that restricting tourism in certain areas is necessary to safeguard traditions and prevent cultural erosion. Others, however, contend that change is inevitable and that banning tourism offers no real benefits. This essay will examine both views before arguing that tourism should not be restricted, as cultural adaptation is a natural process and tourism brings significant advantages.

Advocates of banning tourism believe that it leads to cultural dilution and the loss of traditional values. They argue that the influx of foreign visitors often results in local customs being commercialized or altered to cater to tourists’ expectations. Additionally, mass tourism can lead to the degradation of historical sites and sacred locations, diminishing their cultural and spiritual significance. For example, in certain heritage towns, local festivals have been modified to appeal to tourists, reducing their authenticity. Furthermore, tourism can cause local communities to adopt external influences at the expense of their native traditions, leading to cultural homogenization.

However, banning tourism is neither practical nor beneficial. Change is an inevitable aspect of cultural evolution, and restricting visitors would not halt external influences. In fact, tourism can play a vital role in cultural preservation by generating revenue that supports heritage sites, traditional crafts, and local businesses. Many countries successfully balance cultural conservation and tourism by implementing regulations, such as limiting visitor numbers in sensitive areas and promoting sustainable tourism practices. For instance, Japan has preserved its historic districts while welcoming tourists by imposing strict guidelines on behaviour and architectural restoration. Additionally, cultural exchange through tourism fosters understanding and appreciation among different societies, helping to keep traditions relevant rather than allowing them to fade into obscurity.

In conclusion, while some fear that tourism erodes local cultures, banning it is neither a practical nor an effective solution. Cultural change is inevitable, and instead of restricting visitors, governments should focus on sustainable tourism initiatives that preserve traditions while allowing local economies to thrive.

Idea Generation for this IELTS Essay:

Essay Question:
Some people believe that to protect local culture, tourism should be banned in some areas whereas others think that change is inevitable and that banning tourism will have no benefits

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Essay Type: Discussion Essay

The main question of this IELTS Essay:
A) Should tourism be banned in some areas to protect local culture?
B) Is banning tourism ineffective since cultural change is inevitable?
C) What is your opinion on that?

Arguments for banning tourism to protect local culture:

Prevents cultural erosion:
Tourism often leads to the commercialization of traditions, diluting their authenticity and turning them into mere attractions for visitors. By restricting tourism, local customs and rituals can be preserved in their original form. For example, in Bhutan, the government limits tourist access to protect its unique cultural identity and traditions.

Reduces environmental damage:
Heavy tourist activity often results in environmental degradation, such as deforestation, pollution, and damage to historical sites. Limiting visitor access helps conserve natural and cultural heritage. For instance, restrictions on tourism in the Galápagos Islands help protect its delicate ecosystem from human impact.

Protects local communities from external influence:
Unregulated tourism exposes indigenous communities to foreign lifestyles and values, which may erode their traditional ways of life. Banning tourism in some areas allows them to maintain their cultural integrity. For example, some remote tribes in the Amazon have restricted contact with outsiders to preserve their customs.

Arguments against banning tourism (Change is inevitable and banning tourism has no benefits):

Encourages cultural preservation through tourism revenue:
Tourism generates income that can be reinvested in cultural preservation projects, ensuring that local traditions are maintained. Rather than banning tourism, controlled tourism can help protect cultural heritage. For example, Japan uses revenue from heritage tourism to maintain and restore ancient temples in Kyoto.

Promotes cultural exchange and appreciation:
Interacting with tourists allows local communities to share their heritage and increase global awareness about their traditions. This fosters respect and appreciation for diverse cultures. For instance, in Bali, traditional dance performances attract tourists, helping to sustain these art forms and pass them on to future generations.

Economic benefits for local communities:
Tourism provides employment opportunities and boosts local businesses, improving the standard of living for many communities. Banning tourism could lead to economic hardship for those dependent on the industry. For example, in Thailand, many small villages rely on tourism-related crafts and hospitality for their livelihoods.

Traditional cultures naturally evolve over time:
Cultures are dynamic and constantly change due to social and economic influences. Tourism should not be blamed for cultural shifts that are part of natural progress. For instance, the spread of global cuisine has led to the fusion of traditional dishes, creating new culinary traditions while still preserving cultural identity.

• IELTS Essay
• IELTS Writing Task 2
• IELTS Essay Sample
• Discuss both views
• Discussion Essay

• Prev
• Next